What challenges have been addressed in this line of research?
The important questions were: Which social discussions about intangible cultural heritage play a role? How do you deal with this as a heritage community?
First of all, we identified three areas in which the debate often emerged. These are 1. Questions about intangible heritage with fire (bonfires, fireworks, carbide shooting) 2. Sinterklaas celebrations and 3. Intangible Cultural Heritage with animals (such as falconry, traditions with horses and the like). These three domains each have their own challenges, it turned out. Many people think fires are beautiful and the builders work on them for months. But what about safety and the burden on the environment due to the emission of particulate matter? Sinterklaas, a great party for many - but, as it turns out in the Zwarte Piet debate, not for everyone. And then all those horses at the horse market, are they well taken care of? Yes, says the farmer, no, says the activist. These are difficult decisions. How do togetherness and fun relate to a certain degree of nuisance?
It soon became clear that heritage communities perceived the label 'Controversial' as stigmatizing. That is why we now speak of 'Heritage in Motion' (Erfgoed in beweging). Intangible Cultural Heritage is alive and is always on the move, but these movements are striking in a number of areas - in interaction with shifting norms and values in the wider society. The focus of this line is on the abrasive moments between heritage practice and critical voices from society (and sometimes from the own group or community).